FCC Commissioner Urges Fraud Investigation Ahead of Net Neutrality Vote
Calls grew over the weekend for the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to investigate potential fraud regarding its call for public comments on net neutrality—before the panel votes on the issue on Thursday.
At Wired, FCC commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel—one of two Democrats on the commission who are expected to vote against a net neutrality repeal—raised alarm with an editorial about the integrity of the 23 million comments that have been left on the FCC’s website.
“Roughly a million comments were fraudulently filed using the names of real people,” wrote Rosenworcel. “What’s more, as many as half a million additional comments were filed from Russian email addresses. And 50,000 FCC consumer complaints are missing from the record, even though this is just the kind of data the FCC should be using to inform its efforts.”
The commissioner cited a Wired report about mounting evidence that bots generated more than one million comments that were submitted to the FCC, “to artificially amplify the call to repeal net neutrality protections” as well as to defend the rule, resulting in an obscured picture of how Americans view the issue.
The transparent public comment process demanded by the Administrative Procedure Act, Rosenworcel wrote, “has been utterly corrupted, and it could have wide-ranging implications at every other government agency that seeks public input on its policies.”
A poll taken by Comsumer Reports in September found that two-thirds of Americans support an open Internet, and on Thursday, hundreds of protests were held at Verizon stores across the country to defend the rule.
Net neutrality protections keep internet service providers (ISPs) from discriminating against websites and content by placing them in an internet “slow lane,” while other sites that can afford to pay a premium for faster service. Proponents of the rule say allowing companies like Verizon, Comcast, and Time Warner to discriminate against content would threaten the ability of journalists to report the news freely and activists to use the Internet to reach supporters, and would unfairly favor wealthy companies like Google and Facebook which would be able to pay to be in the “fast lane.”
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT